How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree

PRIME FACTORISATION

Prime factorisation is the process by which a composite number is rewritten as the product of prime factors.

Example 1: Find out the prime factorisation of 30.
First we will see whether the given number is divisible by a least prime number.
Yes, it is, because the digit at its ones place is 0.
30 = 2 × 15
We have, 15 = 3 × 5
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 5
So, the factors of 30 are
∴ 30 = 2 × 3 × 5
2, 3, and 5 are prime factors of 30.

Example 2: Let us consider another number 56.
56 = 2 × 28 = 2 × 2 × 14 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 7
2 and 7 are prime factors of 56.

Prime factorisation of a bigger number using short division method

Let us Explain it by taking an example.
Example 1: Express 256 in prime factorisation.
Divide 256 starting from the smallest prime number which can divide it. Repeat the process till the quotient is no more divisible by the prime number.
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 6
256 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2

Example 2: Express 540 in prime factorisation.
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 7
540 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 × 3 × 5

HIGHEST COMMON FACTOR (HCF)

Rita and Rina went to a stationery shop. Rita purchased 2 pencils, 2 pens, and 1 eraser. Rina purchased 2 pencils, 1 scale, and 1 pen. The common stationery bought by both are pencils and pens. Out of these, common stationery with maximum number is pencil (2). Thus, HCF is 2 pencils.
Highest common factor of two natural numbers is the largest common factor, or divisor of the given natural numbers. In other words, HCF is the greatest element of the set of common factors of the given numbers.
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 8

Example: Let us consider two numbers 45 and 63.
Common factors of 45 and 63 = 1, 3, 9
Highest common factor = 9.
So, the HCF of 45 and 63 is 9.

HCF by prime factorisation method

Let us consider two numbers 72 and 48.
To find prime factorisation, we have to follow these steps.
Step 1: Find the prime factorisation of both the numbers.
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 9
Step 2: Find the common prime factors of the given numbers.
Common factors = 2, 2, 2, 3
Step 3: Multiply all the common factors to find out the HCF.
∴ HCF = 2 × 2 × 2 × 3
= 24
The HCF of two or more numbers is the greatest common factor of all the given numbers.

HCF by long division method

To find HCF using long division method of two
numbers, follow the steps given below.
Step 1: Divide the greater number by smaller number.
Step 2: Take remainder as divisor and the divisor as dividend.
Step 3: Continue the process till you get 0 as the remainder.
Step 4: The last divisor will be the required HCF of the given numbers.

Example 1: Find the HCF of 198 and 360 using the long division method.
Solution:
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 10
Here, the last divisor is 18.
So, HCF of 198 and 360 = 18.

Example 2: Find the greatest number which Exactly divides the numbers 280 and 1245, leaving remainders 4 and 3 respectively.
Solution: Since 4 and 3 are the remainders when 280 and 1245 are divided by the required number.
∴ 280 – 4 = 276 and 1245 – 3 = 1242 will be Exactly divisible by the required number.
We find the HCF of 276 and 1242.
276 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 23
1242 = 2 × 3 × 3 × 3 × 23
∴ HCF = 2 × 3 × 23 = 138
The HCF of 276 and 1242 = 138
So, the required number is 138.

LOWEST COMMON MULTIPLE OR LEAST COMMON MULTIPLE (LCM)

Teena jogs every third day and Meena jogs every fifth day. They are both jogging today. After how many days will they jog together again?
Teena will jog on 3rd day, 6th day, 9th day,…
Meena will jog on 5th day, 10th day, 15th day,…
For Teena, multiples of 3 = 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33,…
For Meena, multiples of 5 = 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45,…
This means, they will jog together after 15 days,
30 days, 45 days, etc. Therefore, 15, 30, 45,… are common multiples of 3 and 5 but the least (lowest) common multiple of 3 and 5 is 15. Hence, after 15 days, they will jog together again.
Least common multiple (LCM) of two natural numbers a and b is the smallest natural number which is a multiple of both a and b.
Since it is a multiple, it can be divided by a and b without leaving a remainder.
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 11
Example 1: Find the LCM of 4, 8, and 12.
Solution: Multiples of 4 = 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48,…
Multiples of 8 = 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72,…
Multiples of 12 = 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84,…
Common multiples = 24,48, 72
Lowest common multiple = 24
So, the LCM of 4, 8,12 is 24.

Example 2: Find the LCM of 25 and 30.
Solution: Multiple of 25 = 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200
Multiples of 30 = 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240
Common multiples of 25 and 30 = 150, 300,…
Least common multiple =150
So, the LCM of 25 and 30 is 150.

Finding LCM by prime factorisation method

To find the LCM by prime factorisation method, we follow the following steps:
Step 1: Express the given numbers as the product of prime numbers.
Step 2: Count the maximum number of times each factor appears then multiply them.
Step 3: The product of those factors is the least common multiple (LCM).

Example 1: Find the LCM of 28, 44, and 132 by the prime factorisation method.
Solution:
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 12
Prime factorisation of 28 = 2 × 2 × 7
Prime factorisation of 44 = 2 × 2 × 11
Prime factorisation of 32 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 11
Here 2 appears twice.
3, 7, and 11 appear once.
∴ LCM = 2 × 2 × 3 × 7 × 11 = 924

Example 2: Find the LCM of 72, 90, and 108 by factorisation method.
Solution:
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 13
Prime factorisation of 72 =2 × 2 × 2 × 3 × 3
Prime factorisation of 108 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 × 3
Here, 2 appears three times, 3 appears three times, and 5 appears once.
∴ LCM = 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 × 3 × 5
= 1080

LCM by common division method

To find the LCM by common division method, we follow these steps.
Step 1: Arrange the numbers in a row separated by commas.
Step 2: Choose a least prime number that divides at least one of the given numbers.
Step 3: Divide the numbers by the number chosen in step 2 and carry forward the undivided numbers.
Step 4: Repeat the process till the number left in the last row is 1.
Step 5: Multiply all the prime divisors to get the LCM.

Example 1: Find the LCM of 102, 170, and 136 by common division method.
Solution:
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 14
LCM = 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 × 5 × 17 = 2040

Example 2: Find the LCM of 11, 22, 24, and 36.
Solution:
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 16
Prime factorisation of 90 = 2 × 3 × 3 × 5
LCM = 2 × 2 × 3 × 11 × 2 × 3 = 792

Example 3: Find the least number which when divided by 20,24, and 36, leaves a remainder of 18 in each case.
Solution: The least number which is exactly divisible by 20, 24, and 36 is the LCM of these numbers. We first find the LCM of 20, 24, and 36.
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 15
∴ LCM = 2 × 2 × 3 × 2 × 3 × 5 = 360
But, the required number is a number that leaves a remainder of 18 in each case.
That means the required number is 18 more than the LCM.
∴ Required number = 360 + 18 = 378

Prime Factors Using Factor Tree Example Problems With Solutions

Example 1:    Find the prime factors of 540
Sol.  
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 1
∴ 5 is a prime number and so cannot be further divided by any prime number
540 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 × 3 × 5 = 22 × 33 ×5

Example 2:    Find the prime factors of 21252
Sol.  
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 2
∴ 21252 = 2 × 2 × 3 × 7 × 11 × 23
= 22 × 3 × 11 × 7 × 23.

Example 3:   Find the prime factors of 8232
Sol.  
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 3
∴ 8232 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 × 7 × 7 × 7
= 23 × 3 × 73.

Example 4:   Find the missing numbers a, b and c in the following factorisation:
How to Find The Prime Factors Using Factor Tree 4
Can you find the number on top without finding the other ?
Sol.   c = 17 × 2 = 34
b = c × 2 = 34 × 2 = 68 and
a = b × 2 = 68 × 2 = 136
i.e.,   a = 136, b = 68 and c = 34.
Yes, we can find the number on top without finding the others.
Reason: The given numbers 2, 2, 2 and 17 are the only prime factors of the number on top and so the number on top = 2 × 2 × 2 × 17 = 136

Maths

Absolute Value Equations

Absolute Value Equations

To solve an absolute value equation, isolate the absolute value on one side of the equal sign, and establish two cases:

Case 1:

|a| = b set a = b
Set the expression inside the absolute value symbol equal to the other given expression.

Case 2:
|a| = b set a = – b
Set the expression inside the absolute value symbol equal to the negation of the other given expression.

Always Check your answers.
The two cases create “derived” equations. These derived equations may not always be true equivalents to the original equation. Consequently, the roots of the derived equations MUST BE CHECKED in the original equation so that you do not list extraneous roots as answers.

Absolute Value Equations 1

Read More:

Example 2: (No solution)

As soon as you isolate the absolute value expression, you observe:

There is no need to work out the two cases in this problem. Absolute value is NEVER equal to a negative value. This equation is never true. The answer is the empty set .

Absolute Value Equations 2

Example 4: A machine fills Quaker Oatmeal containers with 32 ounces of oatmeal. After the containers are filled, another machine weighs them. If the container’s weight differs from the desired 32 ounce weight by more than 0.5 ounces, the container is rejected. Write an equation that can be used to find the heaviest and lightest acceptable weights for the Quaker Oatmeal container. Solve the equation.

Absolute Value Equations 3

Maths

What Is Irrational Number

What Is Irrational Number

  1. A number is irrational if and only if its decimal representation is non-terminating and non-repeating. e.g.√2, √3, π ……………. etc.

  2. Rational number and irrational number taken together form the set of real numbers.
  3. If a and b are two real numbers, then either
    (i) a > b    or    (ii) a =  b    or       (iii)  a < b
  4. Negative of an irrational number is an irrational number.
  5. The sum of a rational number with an irrational number is always irrational.
  6. The product of a non-zero rational number with an irrational number is always an irrational number.
  7. The sum of two irrational numbers is not always an irrational number.
  8. The product of two irrational numbers is not always an irrational number.
  9. In division for all rationals of the form \(\frac { p }{ q } \)(q ≠ 0), p & q are integers, two things can happen either the remainder becomes zero or never becomes zero.

Type (1) Example: \(\frac { 7 }{ 8 } \)  = 0.875
what-is-irrational-number-1
This decimal expansion 0.875 is called terminating.
∴ If remainder is zero then decimal expansion ends (terminates) after finite number of steps. These decimal expansion of such numbers terminating.

Type (2) Example: \(\frac { 1 }{ 3 } \) = 0.333……… = \(0 . \overline{3}\)
what-is-irrational-number-2
or  \(\frac { 1 }{ 7 } \) = 0.142857142857….. =  \(0 . \overline{142857}\)
what-is-irrational-number-3
In both examples remainder is never becomes zero so the decimal expansion is never ends after some or infinite steps of division. These type of decimal expansions are called non terminating.
In above examples, after Ist step & 6 steps of division (respectively) we get remainder equal to dividend so decimal expansion is repeating (recurring).
So these are called non terminating recurring decimal expansions.
Both the above types (1 & 2) are rational numbers.

Types (3) Example: The decimal expansion 0.327172398……is not ends any where, also there is no arrangement of digits (not repeating) so these are called non terminating not recurring. These numbers are called irrational numbers.
Example:
0.1279312793         rational          terminating
0.1279312793….    rational          non terminating
or \(0 . \overline{12793}\)                                      recurring
0.32777              rational          terminating
or \(0 . 32\overline{7}\)                rational         non terminating
0.32777…….                           & recurring
0.5361279             rational         terminating
0.3712854043….   irrational       non terminating non recurring
0.10100100010000 rational       terminating
0.10100100010000….    irrational       non terminating non recurring.

Irrational Number Example Problems With Solutions

Example 1:    Insert a rational and an irrational number between 2 and 3.
Sol.    If a and b are two positive rational numbers such that ab is not a perfect square of a rational number, then \(\sqrt { ab } \) is an irrational number lying between a and b. Also, if a,b are rational numbers, then \(\frac { a+b }{ 2 } \) is a rational number between them.
∴ A rational number between 2 and 3 is
\(\frac { 2+3 }{ 2 } \) = 2.5
An irrational number between 2 and 3 is
= \(\sqrt { 2\times 3 }  \) = \(\sqrt { 6 } \)

Example 2:   Find two irrational numbers between 2 and 2.5.
Sol.   If a and b are two distinct positive rational numbers such that ab is not a perfect square of a rational number, then  is an irrational number lying between a and b.
∴ Irrational number between 2 and 2.5 is
= \(\sqrt { 2\times 2.5 } \) = \(\sqrt { 5 } \)
Similarly, irrational number between 2 and \(\sqrt { 5 } \)  is \(\sqrt { 2\times \sqrt { 5 }  }\)
So, required numbers are \(\sqrt { 5 } \) and \(\sqrt { 2\times \sqrt { 5 }  }\)

Example 3:   Find two irrational numbers lying between \(\sqrt { 2 } \) and \(\sqrt { 3 } \) .
Sol.   We know that, if a and b are two distinct positive irrational numbers, then \(\sqrt { ab } \) is an irrational number lying between a and b.
∴ Irrational number between \(\sqrt { 2 } \)  and \(\sqrt { 3 } \) is  = \(\sqrt { \sqrt { 2 } \times \sqrt { 3 } } \) = 61/4
Irrational number between  \(\sqrt { 2 } \) and 61/4 is \(\sqrt { \sqrt { 2 } \times { 6 }^{ \frac { 1 }{ 4 }  } } \) = 21/4 × 61/8.
Hence required irrational number are 61/4 and
21/4 × 61/8.     
Example 4:    Find two irrational numbers between 0.12 and 0.13.
Sol.    Let a = 0.12 and b = 0.13. Clearly, a and b are rational numbers such that a < b.
We observe that the number a and b have a 1 in the first place of decimal. But in the second place of decimal a has a 2 and b has 3. So, we consider the numbers
c = 0.1201001000100001 ……
and,     d = 0.12101001000100001…….
Clearly, c and d are irrational numbers such that a < c < d < b.

Example 5:   Prove that is \(\sqrt { 2 } \) irrational number
Sol.    Let us assume, to the contrary, that \(\sqrt { 2 } \) is rational. So, we can find integers r and s (≠0) such that \(\sqrt { 2 } =\frac { r }{ s }  \). Suppose r and s not having a common factor other than 1. Then, we divide by the common factor to get \(\sqrt { 2 } =\frac { a }{ b }  \) where a and b are coprime.
So,  b\(\sqrt { 2 } \) = a.
Squaring on both sides and rearranging, we get 2b2 = a2. Therefore, 2 divides a2. Now, by Theorem  it following that 2 divides a.
So, we can write a = 2c for some integer c.
Substituting for a, we get 2b2 = 4c2, that is,
b2 = 2c2.
This means that 2 divides b2, and so 2 divides b (again using Theorem  with p = 2).
Therefore, a and b have at least 2 as a common factor.
But this contradicts the fact that a and b have no common factors other than 1.
This contradiction has arisen because of our incorrect assumption that \(\sqrt { 2 } \) is rational.
So, we conclude that \(\sqrt { 2 } \) is irrational.

Example 6:   Prove that is \(\sqrt { 3 } \) irrational number.
Sol.    Let us assume, to contrary, that  is rational. That is, we can find integers a and b (≠0) such that \(\sqrt { 2 } =\frac { a }{ b }  \). Suppose a and b not having a common factor other than 1, then we can divide by the common factor, and assume that a and b are coprime.
So, b\(\sqrt { 3 } \) = a.
Squaring on both sides, and rearranging, we get 3b2 = a2.
Therefore, a2 is divisible by 3, and by Theorem, it follows that a is also divisible by 3.
So, we can write a = 3c for some integer c.
Substituting for a, we get 3b2 = 9c2, that is,
b2 = 3c2.
This means that b2 is divisible by 3, and so b is also divisible by 3 (using Theorem with p = 3).
Therefore, a and b have at least 3 as a common factor.
But this contradicts the fact that a and b are coprime.
This contradicts the fact that a and b are coprime.
This contradiction has arisen because of our incorrect assumption that \(\sqrt { 3 } \) is rational.
So, we conclude that \(\sqrt { 3 } \) is irrational.

Example 7:  Prove that \(7-\sqrt { 3 }  \) is irrational
Sol.    Method I :
Let \(7-\sqrt { 3 }  \) is rational number
∴ \(7-\sqrt { 3 }  \) = \(\frac { p }{ q }  \)    (p, q are integers, q ≠ 0)
∴ 7 – \(\frac { p }{ q }  \) =  \(\sqrt { 3 } \)
⇒ \(\sqrt { 3 } \) = \(\frac { 7q-p }{ q }  \)
Here p, q are integers
∴ \(\frac { 7q-p }{ q }  \) is also integer
∴ LHS = \(\sqrt { 3 } \) is also integer but this \(\sqrt { 3 } \) is contradiction that  is irrational so our assumption is wrong that \(7-\sqrt { 3 }  \)  is rational
∴ \(7-\sqrt { 3 }  \) is irrational proved.
Method II :
Let \(7-\sqrt { 3 }  \) is rational
we know sum or difference of two rationals is also rational
∴  \(7-7-\sqrt { 3 }  \)
= \(\sqrt { 3 } \) = rational
but this is contradiction that \(\sqrt { 3 } \)  is irrational
∴ \(7-\sqrt { 3 }  \) is irrational     proved.

Example 8:    Prove that \(\frac { \sqrt { 5 }  }{ 3 }  \) is irrational.
Sol.    Let \(\frac { \sqrt { 5 }  }{ 3 }  \) is rational
∴ \(3\left( \frac { \sqrt { 5 }  }{ 3 }  \right) \) = \(\sqrt { 5 } \) is rational
(∵ Q product of two rationals is also rational)
but this is contradiction that \(\sqrt { 5 } \) is irrational
∴ \(\frac { \sqrt { 5 }  }{ 3 }  \) is irrational proved.

Example 9:    Prove that \(2\sqrt { 7 } \) is irrational.
Sol.    Let  is rational
∴ \(2\sqrt { 7 } \times \left( \frac { 1 }{ 2 }  \right) \) = \(\sqrt { 7 } \)
(∵ Q division of two rational no. is also rational)
∴ \(\sqrt { 7 } \)is rational
but this is contradiction that  is irrational
∴ \(2\sqrt { 7 } \) is irrational

Example 10:    Find 3 irrational numbers between 3 & 5.
Solution:    ∵ 3 and 5 both are rational
The irrational are 3.127190385……………
3.212325272930………
3.969129852937…………

Maths

What is Comparing and Ordering of Fractions

What is Comparing and Ordering of Fractions

Comparison of fractions are divided into three categories.

1. Fraction with the same numerator

Let us consider the following fractions with the same numerator: \(\frac{1}{3}\), \(\frac{1}{2}\), \(\frac{1}{6}\)
The pictorial representation of these fractions are given below:
What is Comparing and Ordering of Fractions 1
By looking at the shaded portion in these pictures, we can conclude that
shaded area of B > shaded area of A > shaded area of C
or \(\frac{1}{2}\) > \(\frac{1}{3}\) > \(\frac{1}{6}\)
Thus, we conclude that if two or more fractions have the same numerator, then the fraction with a smaller denominator is greater.

Read More:

2. Fraction with the same denominator

Let us consider the following fractions with the same denominator \(\frac{1}{8}\), \(\frac{3}{8}\), \(\frac{4}{8}\), \(\frac{7}{8}\)
The pictorial representation of these fractions are given below:
What is Comparing and Ordering of Fractions 2
By looking at the shaded portion in these pictures, we can easily say that
shaded area of D > shaded area of C > shaded area of B > shaded area of A
\(\frac{7}{8}\) > \(\frac{4}{8}\) > \(\frac{3}{8}\) > \(\frac{1}{8}\)
Thus, we conclude that if two or more fractions have the same denominator, then the fraction with the greater numerator is the greater fraction.

3. Fractions with different numerators and denominators

To compare the fractions with different numerators and denominators, first we find the LCM of their denominators. Then, we make the denominator of each fraction equal to the LCM by multiplying with a suitable number.

Example 1: Compare the fractions \(\frac{3}{4}\), \(\frac{5}{6}\), \(\frac{6}{7}\), \(\frac{7}{8}\)
Solution: LCM of denominators 4,6,7, and 8 = 168
Hence, the given fractions can be written as
What is Comparing and Ordering of Fractions 3
given fractions can be written as
What is Comparing and Ordering of Fractions 4

Example 2: Arrange the following fractions in ascending order:
Solution: LCM of denominators 4,2,8, and 16
Hence, the given fractions can be written as
What is Comparing and Ordering of Fractions 5
What is Comparing and Ordering of Fractions 6

Maths

What is an Equivalent Fraction

What is an Equivalent Fraction

Equivalent Fraction

To understand the concept of equivalent fractions, let us take an example – Rama gave four cakes to his four children. The first child cut his cake into two equal halves and ate the first half. The second child cut his cake into four equal parts and ate two pieces out of four. The third child cut his cake into six equal parts and ate three of them, and the fourth child cut the cake into eight equal pieces and ate four of them.
What is an Equivalent Fraction 1
Do you think, they have eaten equal parts of the cake? Yes.
What is an Equivalent Fraction 2
This means they all ate \(\frac{1}{2}\) of the cake. Thus, fractions \(\frac{1}{2}\), \(\frac{2}{4}\), \(\frac{3}{6}\), \(\frac{4}{8}\) represent the same fraction \(\frac{1}{2}\). These are called equivalent fractions. So, two or more fractions representing the same part (value) of the whole are called equivalent fractions.
To check if the fractions are equivalent or not, we do cross-multiplication.
What is an Equivalent Fraction 3
What is an Equivalent Fraction 4

Read More:

Note:
We can get as many equivalent fractions as we want, by multiplying/dividing the numerator and denominator of the given fraction by the same number.

Example 1: Write five equivalent fractions of \(\frac{3}{5}\)
Solution:
What is an Equivalent Fraction 5
Hence, the five equivalent fractions of \(\frac{3}{5}\) are
What is an Equivalent Fraction 6

Example 2: Which ofthefollowing pairs of fractions are equivalent:
What is an Equivalent Fraction 7
Solution:
(i) By cross-multiplying the terms of the fractions,
What is an Equivalent Fraction 8
5 × 72 = 12 × 30
360 = 360
∴   \(\frac{5}{12}\) is equivalent to \(\frac{30}{72}\)
(ii) By cross-multiplying the terms of the fractions,
What is an Equivalent Fraction 9
∴   \(\frac{6}{7}\) is equivalent to \(\frac{12}{14}\)

Simplest Form of a Fraction

A fraction is said to be in the lowest term or the simplest form, if its numerator and denominator do not have any common factor other than 1.

Methods to reduce a fraction into the simplest form:
(i) Find the HCF of the numerator and the yg denominator of the given fraction.
(ii) Divide its numerator and denominator by their HCF.
What is an Equivalent Fraction 10
Example: \(\frac{162}{90}\)
HCF of 162 and 90 = 18
Dividing the numerator and denominator of the fraction by their HCF,
So, \(\frac{9}{5}\) is the lowest form of the given fraction because common factor of 9 and 5 is only 1.

Maths